Scott Barrie of
Grainguide.com
Click
here to see an example of Scott's Options Edition
Perry G.
Kevin Warner of Strategic Traders (www.STFUTURES.com) 1-888-842-2263
Click here
to see an example of Kevin's Options 101
Today's Trading Tips
Let’s talk about Method 3
briefly:
This is the one that says you should try to find trading opportunities
that offer a 1:3 Risk to Reward Ratio. That means that the potential
loss (as established by the value between your stop loss price and your
entry price) should be 1/3 the size of the potential profit (as
established by the value between your entry price and your exit price).
Why is that important?
First, a significant number of your actual trades will not be
profitable. Likely that will be 30 to 50 percent of the time over the
long haul. Let’s take the worst case, 50%. To oversimplify, if you loose
$1 on half your trades and make more than $1 on the other half, you will
be successful. Why didn’t I say “make $3 on the other half”?
Because there will be some percentage of the time when your winners do
not reach your exit target. And, there will be a small percentage of the
time when your stop loss was breached, giving you more than a $1 loss.
Gaps and slippage are facts of life in this business. While they can
help us from time to time, it seems like they hurt us much more
frequently.
Second, evaluating potential trades by comparing the apparent Risk to
Reward ratios helps you to decide which trades to make. If you have
three potential trades, one with a 1:3 R:R,
one with a 1:4 R:R, and one with a 1:5 R:R, you may want to make
your largest investment in the 1:5 opportunity. Some people do it that
way, others recognize the randomness of occurrences and they make equal
investments regardless of the R:Rs.
Your call.
Yes, there are traders who like 1:2 opportunities. There are others who
won’t settle for less than 1:4 opportunities. We happen to like the
middle-ground.
Let’s also talk for a moment about using Rich Martins
Market Support &
Resistance Finder
software. Here too, there are different strokes for different folks. I
usually set the limiters (lowest price, highest price, starting date and
number of hits) to give me 4 to 7 pages of data.
In
addition, when there is enough data within the price range I am
interested in, I will use the last 3-4 months of data- nothing older.
Remember, it is both the density (number of hits) and the age
of the price barriers that we are interested in.
Yeah, I find that I have to reset the limiters from time to time-
especially when there have been a series of limit moves in one direction
lately. Whenever possible, I like to have the software print out all
the hits. When there is too much data, that
is impractical (and a major waste of paper). If the current price is
above my 61.8% LORs on both the Daily and Weekly charts, I often set the
lower limit to correspond to my 38.2% value. If it is below the 38.2%
LOR on both charts, I do the opposite (again, just to save paper).
I
usually run the reports on Saturdays so that Fridays
data has all been downloaded. During the following week, I add in the
new data by putting pen to paper. I even use codes to help me tell when
the hits occurred (M, T, W, Th,
F). I no longer pay attention to whether the
hits were highs or lows. That practice is optional. Some traders swear
that highs stop up moves and lows stop down moves. I just happen to
think that it is easier to swear than it is to prove.
DISCLOSURE OF RISK:
THE RISK OF LOSS IN TRADING
FUTURES AND OPTIONS CAN BE SUBSTANTIAL; THEREFORE, ONLY GENUINE RISK
FUNDS SHOULD BE USED. FUTURES AND OPTIONS MAY NOT BE SUITABLE
INVESTMENTS FOR ALL INDIVIDUALS, AND INDIVIDUALS SHOULD CAREFULLY
CONSIDER THEIR FINANCIAL CONDITION IN DECIDING WHETHER TO TRADE. OPTION
TRADERS SHOULD BE AWARE THAT THE EXERCISE OF A LONG OPTION WOULD RESULT
IN A FUTURES POSITION.
HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS
HAVE MANY INHERENT LIMITATIONS, SOME OF WHICH ARE DESCRIBED BELOW. NO
REPRESENTATION IS BEING MADE THAT ANY ACCOUNT WILL,OR IS LIKELY TO,
ACHIEVE PROFITS OR LOSSES SIMILAR TO THOSE SHOWN.IN FACT,THERE ARE
FREQUENTLY SHARP DIFFERENCES BETWEEN HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS
AND THE ACTUAL RESULTS SUBSEQUENTLY ACHIEVED BY ANY PARTICULAR TRADING
PROGRAM.
ONE OF THE LIMITATIONS OF
HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS IS THAT THEY ARE GENERALLY PREPARED
WITH THE BENEFIT OF HINDSIGHT. IN ADDITION, HYPOTHETICAL TRADING DOES
NOT INVOLVE FINANCIAL RISK, AND NO HYPOTHETICAL TRADING RECORD CAN
COMPLETELY ACCOUNT FOR THE IMPACT OF FINANCIAL RISK IN ACTUAL TRADING.
FOR EXAMPLE, THE ABILITY TO WITHSTAND LOSSES OR TO ADHERE TO A
PARTICULAR TRADING PROGRAM, IN SPITE OF TRADING LOSSES, ARE MATERIAL
POINTS WHICH CAN ALSO ADVERSELY AFFECT ACTUAL TRADING RESULTS. THERE ARE
NUMEROUS OTHER FACTORS RELATED TO THE MARKETS, IN GENERAL, OR TO THE
IMPLEMENTATION OF ANY SPECIFIC TRADING PROGRAM WHICH CANNOT BE FULLY
ACCOUNTED FOR IN THE PREPARATION OF HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS AND
ALL OF WHICH CAN ADVERSELY AFFECT ACTUAL TRADING RESULTS.